Guess who is coming to justice? These are the members of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. | House of Commons
News
An Act to amend the Criminal Code Bill C-484 private member’s bill passes second reading - so what’s next?
by | March 11, 2008
Last Wednesday, Bill C-484 – An Act to amend the Criminal Code (injuring or causing the death of an unborn child while committing an offence) – was read in the House of Commons for a second time. The vote – Yeas: 147; Nays: 132.
What does this result mean? That the bill has now been referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.
And now, many Canadians are wondering what that means.
a private matter
C-484 – also known as the Unborn Victims of Crime Act – is a Private Member Bill introduced by Conservative Member of Parliament Ken Epp. Because it was not a government bill, all the parties followed House of Commons tradition and allowed a free vote. Only the Bloc Québecois voted uniformly – against. The majority of Conservatives supported it. All but one New Democrat voted against. The Liberal Party was the most divided for and against the bill.
While supporters of this bill insist that it excludes abortion, choice activists are concerned that it opens up the question of “personhood” and rights for the fetus. They point to things like the number of times the word “child” is used in the bill: 15, to be exact. They also point to similar laws elsewhere, which can be (and are) used to control pregnant women.
Supporters of the bill point to increased rates of violence against pregnant women. While violence against women in general is a serious problem, the rate in fact increases with pregancy and soon after giving birth. A U.S. study discovered “that a pregnant or recently pregnant woman is more likely to be a victim of homicide than to die of any other cause.”
It raises the question: What do we as a society do to stop this violence?
abuse during pregnancy
- 1 in 6 pregnant women are abused during pregnancy (Middlesex-London Health Unit, 2000).
- Women abused during pregnancy were four times as likely as other abused women to report having experienced very serious violence, including being beaten up, choked, threatened with a gun/knife or sexually assaulted. (Health Canada, 2004).
- Of the women who were abused during pregnancy, approximately 18% reported that they had suffered a miscarriage or other internal injuries as a result of the abuse. (Health Canada, 2004.)
going through the motions
This bill has passed second reading. It is a long way from becoming law. And, right now is a perfect time for people to have their say about whether the Unborn Victims of Crime Act should move forward, whether it needs to be amended, or whether it should not be considered beyond the committee stage.
To become law, a bill must first be intoduced in either the Senate or the House of Commons. It must then pass through various stages in each House: first, second and third reading. Then it must receive Royal Assent.
With last week’s vote, the House agreed to refer Bill C-484 to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. It will be a while before we know when the committee plans to review the bill. We do know that it can ask witnesses and experts to speak about issues around the proposed legislation.
So there are a couple of things to do right now:
- Contact the full committee by sending a message to JUST@parl.gc.ca. Be sure to direct your message to Miriam Burke, Clerk of the committee.
— Send in your name – or the name of your organization – for consideration when the committee begins its witness selection process.
— Send a formal written statement to the full committee. - Contact individual committee members. Below you will find their names, party affiliations, how they voted, email addresses and a link to each member’s general contact and information page. Let the one woman and 11 men on the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights know what you are thinking. It’s what democracy is all about!
Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights (JUST)
Y = voted for Bill C-484
N = voted against Bill C-484
BQ=Bloc Québecois | C=Conservative | L=Liberal | NDP=New Democratic Party
chair
Y | Art Hanger (C) email: Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
vice-chairs
N | Réal Ménard (BQ) email: Menard.R@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
N | Brian Murphy (L) email: Murphy.B@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
members
N | Larry Bagnell (L) email: Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
Y | Blaine Calkins (C) email: Calkins.B@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
N | Joe Comartin (NDP) email: comartin.j@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
Y | Rick Dykstra (C) email: Dykstra.R@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
N | Carole Freeman (BQ) email: Freeman.C@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
N | Dominic LeBlanc (L) email: Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
Y | Derek Lee (L) email: Lee.D@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
Y | Rob Moore (C) email: Moore.R@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
Y | Daniel Petit (C) email: Petit.D@parl.gc.ca | MP Profile page
A bit more background: politics, pregnancy and crime, section15.ca blog item | February 12, 2008
-
-
tools
- email this page
- comment
- contact us
- rss
-
-
-
share
- digg
- stumbleupon
- newsvine
-
-
-
bookmark
- del.icio.us
- yahoo
-
features
Recent Features
- grandmothers to grandmothers
by
- remaining RebELLES
by
- Toujours RebELLES from the inside
by
- Regent Park Film Festival, community cinema from distant lands
by
- Rita MacNeil, “I’m no rabble-rouser.”
by
- more features
Recent Comments
- Audrey on Toujours RebELLES from the inside
Thursday November 20 | 2:54 pm
- jude on exploitation in Canada: human trafficking, exotic dance and temporary visas
Wednesday October 29 | 11:11 am
- jude on the Pan-Canadian Young Feminist Gathering: catch a Wave of Resistance, October 11–13, 2008
Wednesday October 29 | 7:59 am
- jude on vote low, rep high
Thursday October 16 | 7:09 am
- jude on Equal Voice tracks federal election
Tuesday September 23 | 9:22 am


comments
1 jude | March 26 2008
This announcement is from the Ryerson Womyn's Centre:Ryerson Womyn's Centre Call for Action:
Direct Challenge to Women's Reproductive Rights: Bill C484
Bill C484 is a bill proposed to protect "unborn victims of crime," and has already gone through a second reading in parliament. Action is needed now to stop this bill from being passed. It is a clear step backwards in the fight for reproductive rights for women, and infringes on our choices. Jessica Yee will be conducting a half an hour discussion and Q & A about the bill and exactly what it means, followed by a letter writing session.
There will be an information/letter writing session will be held:
Thursday March 27
6 pm - 8 pm in the Second Floor Lounge of the
Student Campus Centre
(55 Gould Street)
Hope to see all of you there. This is an urgent call for action.
2 jude | June 3 2008
Abortion rights backers take stand against bill, by CHRISTOPHER MAUGHAN, The Gazette | June 2, 2008Quebec doctors' federation joins fight against bill for 'unborn victims of crime', cbc.ca | April 16, 2008
3 jude | August 25 2008
Feminist activist and writer jennaow comments about the Unborn Victims of Crime Act on YouTube -Bill C-484: "All that Glitters is not Gold"
4 jude | August 27 2008
Tories abandon 'unborn victims' bill, by BRODIE FENLON, globeandmail.com | August 25, 2008Justice Minister Rob Nicholson announced Monday that the government will draft a new bill to replace Bill C-484, the Unborn Victims of Crime Act, so that it closes the debate about fetal rights and focuses instead on penalizing criminals who harm pregnant women.
... "We've heard criticism from across the country, including representatives of the medical community, that Mr. Epp's bill as presently drafted could be interpreted as instilling fetal rights. Let me be clear. Our government will not reopen the debate on abortion," Mr. Nicholson said.
"For this reason ... I'm announcing that the government will introduce legislation that will punish criminals who commit violence against pregnant women but do so in a way that leaves no room for the introduction of fetal rights."
City MP won't retract unborn crime bill, by CHRISTINA SPENCER, Edmonton Sun | August 26, 2008
"I definitely will not be withdrawing my bill," Epp told Sun Media. "They're quite different. I don't intend to let up."